It's not about the tools itself, but rather just to build and learn the process. So I've elected to do it the hard way :P
4DVersion is still-born.. maybe you want to discuss what you're working on with a group of interested customers, off-line? On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Aparajita Fishman <[email protected]> wrote: >> Since 4Dv12 will not have the "source-code lifecycle" features that >> were hinted/promised from before, I'm working on building my own tools >> that I'll need to keep track of 4D code and Active4D files. >> >> Between Subversion and Git, what are your preferences? > > Subversion is now old school. Git is ***way*** better. > > I already have a working 4D 2004<->git bridge, but to update it for v11 and > bring it to market I will need additional funding. Trust me, it is a lot of > work to do it right, I recommend that you not try to reinvent this > particular wheel. > > If enough people want to support it I will be happy to finish it up. > > >> And what tools >> do you use to manage them, i.e. submit source files, checkout/in etc. > > Windows: tortoise git > Mac: gitx, gitnub > > For either, you should look at using github.com as the remote repository. > > Kind regards, > > Aparajita > www.aparajitaworld.com > > "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed." > - Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoy.org > > _______________________________________________ > Active4D-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev > Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/ > -- m|a _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
