On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 14:11:37 Fania Bremmer wrote: > Before integrating this phrase we tested with a lot of people. We tested > different words and phrases like "protect, lock, mark...as private, > secure" etc. The result has beenthat most people preferred and > understood the phrase "lock as private".
what were the question(s) that were asked when testing this? > Here both results, the locking > of the activity with a password AND the encryption of the private data, > have been understood. why? could this be accomplished in the UI that sets the password? or in a message that appears in-line when Private is selected? in documentation? (i ask because i'm not sure i understand why this needs to be communicated in the label for the toggle switch, and i do think it makes the dialog overly verbose ... ) > One thing in general: I am thinking about a while now about some kind of > wizard in this case: we could split those 3 steps into a small, little > wizard, at least for the creation of new activities. That makes it easy > to add different steps in between, like the private activities step -> > it would be a handy and guided flow for the user, where he can quickly > create a new activity. my concern is that this takes too much time to set up an activity and that it also would deviate from the "configure activity" UI. -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
