On Tuesday 21 August 2012, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > i think the timeout is still (partly) governed by the screensaver > > timeout, so without that kcm wouldn't make much sense, should be > > uniquely powermanagement governed timeouts? > > sounds reasonable to move it to powermanagement > > > oh, another thing.. what about widgets on screensaver? is something that > > we really want to keep? > > should still work, IIRC I adjusted it. Personally I would like to have it > as the default, but it's too slow in loading.
yeah, i see. when asked to close the locker from the toolbox, it seems to try to load its own piece of qml for authentication (going to a black screen, btw) doesn't this leads to a potential duplicated implementation of the whole greeter? -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Active mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
