On Tuesday 21 August 2012 19:20:08 Marco Martin wrote: > On Tuesday 21 August 2012, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > i think the timeout is still (partly) governed by the screensaver > > > timeout, so without that kcm wouldn't make much sense, should be > > > uniquely powermanagement governed timeouts? > > > > sounds reasonable to move it to powermanagement > > > > > oh, another thing.. what about widgets on screensaver? is something that > > > we really want to keep? > > > > should still work, IIRC I adjusted it. Personally I would like to have it > > as the default, but it's too slow in loading. > > yeah, i see. > when asked to close the locker from the toolbox, it seems to try to load its > own piece of qml for authentication (going to a black screen, btw) uh that used to work properly and IIRC it loads exactly the same greeter as the normal one. But yeah there is quite some duplication and the best solution would be to have just one locker which support Plasmoids and is fast :-P
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
