On Monday 29 October 2012 21:50:47 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Monday, October 29, 2012 21:11:32 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Monday 29 October 2012 20:54:49 Marco Martin wrote: > > > hi all, > > > i seen that when kwin is built as "kwinactive" executable it takes its > > > config from kwinactiverc, but the rules are still taken from > > > kwinrulesrc, > > > shouldn't it be kwinactiverulesrc as well? (to have different sets, ie > > > one > > > would want the fullscreen prevention only on kwinactive) > > > > we currently do not ship any rules for active and given that the kcm is > > not > > compiled for kwinactive, I am not sure whether it is needed. > > Marco wrote his email because we are probably going to be shipping rules for > active; we ran into an issue with applications written for Nemo where > things are done a bit differently. i'm guessing that's what motivated his > mail. ah yes, then it would make sense to change that part, too. Especially if the rules are useless for the desktop case. > > this will become a bigger issue, btw, when we implement proper runtime shell > switching. as soon as Plasma Desktop is all-singing/all-dancing QML, i'm > hoping this will allow us to switch workspace concepts by simply destroying > and loading a new set of QML (no process restart!). > > .. and this, i fear, is where our use of environment variables is likely to > let us down. > > i'm quite tempted to move these things into a kded module that keeps track > of the workspace type details and publishes them via a dbus service ... but > this is a discussion for another day and another thread. *nods* ;-) > > -- > Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Active mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
