On Friday 02 November 2012 12:27:39 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2012, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > Marco wrote his email because we are probably going to be shipping rules
> > > for active; we ran into an issue with applications written for Nemo
> > > where things are done a bit differently. i'm guessing that's what
> > > motivated his mail.
> >
> > ah yes, then it would make sense to change that part, too. Especially if
> > the rules are useless for the desktop case.
>
> so in the end how do we proceed for now?
> in any way to me is fine, using kwinactiverulesrc or kwinrulesrc
if you want to ship rules in active, I think it would make sense to create a
${KWIN_NAME}rulesrc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
