On Tuesday 15 January 2013, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Tuesday 15 January 2013 15:38:22 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Monday, January 14, 2013 14:11:25 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > Maybe this is the point where using Reviewboard may start making sense, > > > so they can get their patches reviewed in a structured process? > > > > absolutely. question is whether we want/need a unique product for this, > > or if we just use the plasma group for it. personally, i'd be happy with > > using the plasma group as much of the changes should be looked at by the > > same group of folks... > > hasn't there been the idea to merge active more into plasma again? If that > is still the plan, it should just reuse the Plasma group.
yeah, i thin this is still the plan,, also counting recent discussions on plsama-devel about bringing together all "workspace" related projects -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active