On Thursday, January 31, 2013 14:00:11 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > I've heard repeatedly from members of the Plasma Active team that a bunch of > isolated "half toy half utility" apps is precisely what PA is _not_ > supposed to be.
correct; that said, it is also just fine if people write such applications and make them available to users of Plasma Active. it's simply not what we optimize for. the other side of that is what marco notes: we shouldn't make it harder to make "half toy half utility" apps if that's what someone wants to do. so we focus on the "not an app bucket" concept and deliver that to people .. and the masses who come will fill in the crApps as they see fit :) of course, if we design the productivity aspects well enough, many 3rd parties will take advantage of them. so as marco notes, we need to keep in mind that should we introduce this pseudo-language system we need to keep both using it and creating apps that use those systems easy .. and i think we can :) -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Active mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
