On Tuesday 05 February 2013, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > themselves but in digiKams own database. If I remember correctly, there > are plans to make digiKam use Nepomuk for tagging, but I don't know the > current status of that effort. But even then we'd still need to > synchronize Nepomuk data from the computer running digiKam to the PA > device. We definitely want that synchronization as well, but this will > probably be a non-trivial matter.
digikam doesn't save tags in the files, i *think* uses nepomuk altough i am not sure. I see it installs its own nepomuk service, that looks like is trying to do something too clever here... -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active