Title: Message

So what is the impact of placing DNS servers at each remote location?  Significant?  Or minimal?  (given connections are all greater than 256k frame)

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Monday, July 14, 2003 1:26 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)

 

I believe you are correct. Additionally, though, I don't think DNS replication traffic is all that considerable. The worst data hog in DNS is the resolver cache, which isn't replicated.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rogers, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:10 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)

I was looking more along the lines of replication traffic.  However since the zone is replicated within AD....there shouldn't be any additional (or if so very minimal) replication traffic between the DNS servers other than the normal AD replication traffic correct?

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 10:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)

 

I always configure every DC as a DNS server. I consider that if a location requires a DC, it also requires local DNS.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rogers, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 10:39 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)

1.      When configuring an AD Integrated DNS zone, at least one DC in each site should be running DNS?  Or all DCs should be running DNS?  Would it matter either way?

 

 

Reply via email to