Apologies for the last post- the size doesn't increase to 384 megs, but rather to 512.
You get this with either SP4 or post-Sp3 hotfix: 811370 Issues That Are Fixed in the Post-Service Pack 3 Release of Ntfrs.exe http://support.microsoft.com/?id=811370 /Siddharth On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Najem Oulad Ali wrote: > It desapear by itself...after a few days. > Or you can delete the content of the NTFRS folder ...and then it's OK. > > Good luck > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Hogenauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: donderdag 21 augustus 2003 0:10 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement > > > Has anyone seen the Event error 1168 (NDTS Database) after the install > of SP4? > > > Mike Hogenauer > > Rendition Networks, Inc. > > 10735 Willows Rd NE, Suite 150 > > Redmond, WA 98052 > > 425.636.2148 | Fax: 425.497.1149 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 3:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement > > "Inside Active Directory" by Sakari Kouti and Mika Seitsonen is my > current fave. > > Another that hits the big time is Gary Olsen's "Windows 2000 Active > Directory Design and Deployment". > > However, Roger is just cooler than I am - hopefully, he'll pipe in and > post his book web page for you! > > Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT > Microsoft MVP - Active Directory > Associate Expert > Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer > Fountain > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement > > are there any goods sites or books that go into detail about site > replication, etc? I have notes from the field - are there any others I > should look into? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:30 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement > > > I would also suggest making sure that you schedule replication at > specific intervals to that location by making it a site, and not use the > bandwidth for constant directory replication. > > Toddler > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement > > > Jennifer, > > Make the DC at the remote a GC - it is going to greatly speed up the > resolution of many functions that are not exactly unique to Exchange, > but do play a part in it's operation. > > Even if the Exchange server is remote to the user, they will use a GC > local to them. > > Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT > Microsoft MVP - Active Directory > Associate Expert > Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer > Fountain > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement > > I need some advice on placing a GC at one of my remote locations. I > have a 256kbps connection to my remote site that only contains 20 > people. I have a DC installed at that location but users connect to > their email at my location. Currently when they click to send an email, > it takes 19-20 seconds to send. - outlook 2000 sp3 (receiving seems to > be ok) I am wondering - if making their existing DC into a GC, it may > speed up? grasping here? I hate to put an exchange server at that > location with only 20 people but according to this article: > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodt > echnol/windowsserver2003/proddocs/deployguide/dssbd_topo_dljo.asp it is > not advised to put a GC at that location - granted this seems to be for > windows 2003 and we have 2000 - not sure if ths still pertains. > > any advice would be greatly appreciated. > Jenn > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
