RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

[Ken Cornetet]

Title: Message

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;275553&Product=win2000

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

can someone explain to me what devolution is?

"Juan Ibarra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/25/2003 12:14 PM MST
Please respond to ActiveDir

To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
bcc: James S. Cate/CONTRACTOR/FIA/CO/GSA/GOV
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

OK. I meant windows 2003 AD
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS



If you are planning on implementing AD, I would suggest using MS DNS. Just to save you a few headaches.



On the other hand, I have never heard of Win2k 2003, so I am talking out my ass here.



Thank you,
Mitchell D. Lawrence

**<Good|Cheap|Fast> (Pick Two)**

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan Ibarra
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS



Hi, we are planning the upgrade from NT to Win2k 2003.  Currently we use Unix DNS, the question is should I keep it just make sure it supports NDR records or replace it with Microsoft DNS.

Any pros and cons?

Thanks,
Juan

List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/