I would build an NT4 BDC on the domain, yank it off the main network and in
the lab promote it to PDC, build another NT4 BDC (so you can retry if the
process is wrong), upgrade the NT4 PDC to W2K, build and promote a fresh W2K
Server. See how the process goes and get familiar with it and run some tests
against that little test domain and make sure there really isn't any data
that you lose that you aren't comfortable with losing so you can work out
processes to not lose it. There are obviously missing details here (like
setting up a little dns and this needs to be off the main network). 

This will get you the comfort level you want for this and the timing and
then you can sell your bosses and then you can schedule the modification in
production. 


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rocky Habeeb
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Joe,

Thank you for responding to my question, in light of the work you do and the
others.  I'm sorry I did not respond before, but I've been under attack.
Our AD is very unpopulated.  It contains nothing more than what migrates
over during a Win2K Domain upgrade.  We do not run Exchange or any other AD
aware application.  I'm really not concerned with "losing much".  I don't
know what I would lose but if Users could still log on, access reources and
work away, I would consider it a success.  What I am concerned with is the
potential for a train wreck and getting called on the carpet, the former,
more than the latter.

Rocky
___________________________________________________

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 1:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] You guys amaze me!


Right up front, the domain rename scares me. Everyone seems to say, yeah it
is there but....

Before I answer anything else though, what kind of data do you have in AD?
Is it the basic NOS stuff or have you deployed Exchange or other AD aware
apps that have populated it? My guess is you aren't doing a lot with AD yet
so most likely following option two doesn't lose much if any information
that you can't export off into LDIFs and reimport after you are back to W2K
DC's.

Pay isn't bad. However, in relative terms you are probably doing better. 100
users per admin versus our ratio of something like 83000 users per admin and
I would be lucky to be making 5x-10x what you make let alone 830x.... On the
flip side though, you probably haven't put a provisioning system and auto
password reset system into place - yet. :op

   joe


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rocky Habeeb
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm serious.

Here is a question for you.  As always, if you could offer any info, I would
be very grateful.  We're a small shop with only 2 Admins managing 200 users
in 4 states and we don't have the firepower you guys do.

Let's say you don't like your AD domain name and you want to change it.  You
have 4 DCs, 3 each W2K SP3 and 1 each NT4 SP6a, so you're still in mixed
mode.  You could move the NT DC to 2K, then move everyone to W2K3, then
raise the Forest functionality level and then play Russian Roulette with
Rendom.  That's one option.  Or could it be as simple as DCPromoing all 3
W2K3 servers down to Standalone servers, allowing the NT4 DC which still
controls the pre-W2K subdomain name to take full control of the domain
again, and then DCPromoing one of the 3 W2K DCs back up to W2K as the FSMO
and renaming the domain to what you want?  I would love to believe I could
do it and get away with it.

Thank you people.

PS:  I don't envy you Joe.  I hope you're being paid well!

RH

-------------------------------------------------
Rocky Habeeb
Microsoft Systems Administrator
-------------------------------------------------
James W. Sewall Company
Old Town, Maine
-------------------------------------------------
207.827.4456
habr @ jws.com
www.jws.com
-------------------------------------------------

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to