Yes, it is taking full advantage of the hyperthreading.

Keep in mind that hyperthreading IS NOT two separate processors. It is a
parallel execution path within the processor, which can't always be
leveraged. Some applications can and some can't - but there's no definitive
way to say an app can or can't do it.

Roger
--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Baudino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 12:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows Standard Server 2003 or 
> Enterprise Server 2003 as DCs
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Dumb question but one that for some strange reason we can't get a
> definitive answer about.  Xeon processors with hyperthreading seem to
> appear as two processors instead of one to both Windows 2000 
> Server and
> Server 2003.  I thought that 2003 would be able to 
> differentiate between
> the physical processors and the virtual processors.  In 
> addition, I've seen
> conflicting documentation on Microsoft's site stating that 
> Standard Server
> 2003 supports up to two processors and supports up to four processors.
> 
> That said, if we are building HP DL380G3's with 
> hyperthreading would we
> need Enterprise Server 2003 or Standard?  We're planning on 
> using them for
> domain controllers and we're trying to remember why we 
> ordered Enterprise
> Server 2003 when it appears that the much less expensive 
> Standard Server
> 2003 would suffice.
> 
> We're running DL380G3's and BL20pG2's with two processors and Standard
> Server 2003 seems to be running fine.  But is it taking full 
> advantage of
> the processors or running in some sort of crippled mode where 
> it doesn't
> utilize the hyperthreading?  Perfmon seems to show that it's 
> using both of
> the physicals and both of the virtuals...but...
> 
> Any info would be appreciated.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> ******************* PLEASE NOTE *******************
> This E-Mail/telefax message and any documents accompanying this
> transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential 
> information and is
> intended solely for the addressee(s) named above.  If you are not the
> intended addressee/recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of,
> disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on the contents of this
> E-Mail/telefax information is strictly prohibited and may 
> result in legal
> action against you. Please reply to the sender advising of 
> the error in
> transmission and immediately delete/destroy the message and any
> accompanying documents.  Thank you.
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to