ActiveRoles from Quest has always come with an update utility and an
LDIF file is available on request for exactly the reasons you
describe...

Joe.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
Sent: 30 January 2004 14:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] schema updates

I completely agree with you Joe.  I've been hassling vendors left, right
and centre to provide LDIF files for schema extensions.  Unfortunately,
noone appears to listen.  The most recent extensions I've tested have
been from MS (SMS 2003) and HP (Managed Objects), both of which fail to
provide LDIFs.  If we can't get the big boys to provide them, what hope
do we have with the smaller vendors.

VMWare with its snapshot facility is great for testing schema updates.
(Except for when you click the Revert button just next to Snaphot by
accident - something I've done more than once!)

Tony

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
Wrom: PWIGYOKSTTZRCLBDXRQBGJSNBOHM
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:24:21 -0500

I will debate this one... :op
 
First no one should put in anything they don't completely trust. I
allowed
that to happen once and now I have a bunch of attributes/objects out
there
that have nothing to do with anything and almost certainly won't be used
because the people driving it didn't have a clue what they were doing
but
had enough weight (at the time) to force the issue. Now I have them as
an
example to give me weight for any other people whom I don't trust.
 
Schema changes are one thing that should be worked and reworked and
reworked
in the lab until you are sure of the outcome. Pulling a live copy of
production into a disconnected lab for this is invaluable and in my view
an
absolute requirement. 
 
Unless you find something that is an absolute "it must go in this
specific
order" because of issues you have seen, try to put them all together and
not
have the schema cache update until it hits the end. 
 
If people give you programs to run instead of LDIF files, beat on the
vendor
as that is very bad on their part - Hear me MS, W2K3 forest prep pissed
me
right the [EMAIL PROTECTED] off. 
 
Anyway, take the LDIFs and pull the schema cache update entries out and
tie
them all together and try it in the lab to make sure everything goes
well.
 
Note this is an OUTSTANDING place to use Virtual machines. 
 
  joe
 
 

  _____  

Wrom: KHJYFMYXOEAIJJPHSCRTNHGSWZIDREXCAX
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 7:37 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] schema updates



To me it depends if you're stacking like or unlike schema updates. For
instance, with Exchange 2000 there are 2 sets of updates - the ADC and
the
Exchange proper ones. I'd stack those any day.

Now - if you're talking custom schema stuff, or extensions from
companies
you don't completely trust, then maybe staggering them makes more sense.

The real question is are schema updates queued into the regular
replication
interval or does the schema update process itself force replication?

-------------------------------------------------------------- 
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP 
Sr. Systems Administrator 
Inovis Inc. 

>  -----Original Message----- 
> Wrom: ZOWCONEUQZAAFXISHJEXXIMQZUIVOTQNQEMSFDULHPQQWOYIY
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 12:39 AM 
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject:      [ActiveDir] schema updates 
> 
> Sorry if this has come up before (haven't seen it hit the list). 
> 
> We have some schema updates to do... but was curious whether 
> stacking them up back to back was a very good idea since they 
> all require full gc syncs.  We've tested the extensions 
> individually in the lab, and they all act fine... any comments 
> on why you should or should not do this?  :-) 



List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to