Oh get over it Joe. Don't be such a weenie. Live life on the edge and
use security group filtering on GPOs. Its good fun and good for you :-)


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 6:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Linking other GPO objects to Domain Controllers

Hey Michael, looks like you got an answer from Darren (though I dislike
processing GPOs based on group memberships). However, would it be ok to
ask WHY you would want to do this? Setting up DCs as one offs is usually
a great way to court a troubleshooting problem that is a pain in the
butt to resolve later. 

  joe 


-------------
http://www.joeware.net   (download joeware)
http://www.cafeshops.com/joewarenet  (wear joeware)
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes,
Michael M.
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Linking other GPO objects to Domain Controllers

Related question:
Because of some testing we are doing in a production environment (yes, I
know - ahem, ah try a test environment; can't in this situation), we
would like to override the policy "Microsoft Network Server - digitally
sign communications (always)" that is set in the Default Domain
Controllers policy by using the local Domain Controller policy on a
particular DC.  But it appears not to be "overrideable".  Is this the
expected behavior?  If so, how could we accomplish this?  TIA!

Mike Thommes

-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Mar-Elia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Linking other GPO objects to Domain Controllers


Agreed. Not much downside to this as long as you're not putting policies
on these other GPOs that conflict with any set in the DDC policy. Even
in that case, you just have to manage the conflicts. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rutherford,
Robert
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Linking other GPO objects to Domain Controllers

It's common practice to add other GPO links to the DC OU.

-----Original Message-----
From: Devan Pala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 March 2004 15:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Linking other GPO objects to Domain Controllers


Hi all,

Question:

Has anyone experienced issues or know of any 'gotchas' with linking
other GPO objects to the Domain Controllers OU in addition to the
Default Domain Controllers Policy.

Rationale:

I would like to have a GPO ready that essentially has Windows Update
enabled for deploying approved updates from a central SUS server. When
an update is available, tested and if required, the GPO is linked to the
Domain Controllers OU and available for install depending on each DC's
detection cycle and configured parameters.

Why not modify the Default Domain Controllers Policy?

At least this way, I will have complete control of when updates are
pushed and importantly, if I would like to retract the updates unlinking
this 'other' GPO is easier and I believe safer than changing
configuration settings on the Default Domain Controllers Policy.

Another nice feature would be that the by unlinking this policy the
update would also be removed from the Windows Update folder on each
client (the

DC).

Your thoughts, suggestions and comments are as always, appreciated.

Thanks,
Devan.

_________________________________________________________________
Find a broadband plan that fits. Great local deals on high-speed
Internet access. 
https://broadband.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any use (including retransmission or copying) of this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient of this transmission,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The
sender is not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this
communication as it has been transmitted over a public network. Any
replies to this email may be monitored by the MCPS-PRS Alliance for
quality control and other purposes.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to