I'm not making fun of ~Eric. That is your call sign, when I say ~Eric, there isn't a single person who confuses that with any other Eric's that are running around.
BTW, I am guessing you mean me when you say this, I would know for sure if you had written: (would have been ~Eric but joe's been making fun of that as of late ;)) Rick has given me a very bad reputation of being mean or something. I am very nice, I am just outspoken when something is stupid or wrong which is unusual in this overly politicaly correct world. Also people think I hate Exchange and the Exchange Dev guys, this is simply untrue, I just don't think the code flows as well as it probably should (not elegant) and was based on many bad security assumptions and uses Active Directory like a red headed step child instead of as a respectable directory. I like to question things, not sit back and say, hmm ok, they want me to do it that way, I guess I better change everything I had planned for how this was going to go so it fits how they want me to be configured. To think I was going to say your initial response to the LDAP Stress Tool topic was an outstanding response and that I had bookmarked it for later regurgitation to anyone else who asked a question like that... joe -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 9:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP stress tool for AD 2003 I've dissected a bit and put some info inline. I'm a bit tired so sorry if it is a bit incoherent. ;) Eric (would have been ~Eric but Joe's been making fun of that as of late ;)) Eric Fleischman Escalation Engineer Platforms Critical Problem Resolution (CPR) - Directory Services List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
