Why would they need NTLM2 authentication and SMB Signing?  Is this
something that Windows 2003 requires?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carerros,
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:34 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain

I think there is more I have to do to get it work with AD though.  Don't
have I to make sure that the workstation is using NTLM2 authentication
and
SMB signing?  (In which case I still might have to write off my Win95
boxes
because I don't believe that they support either of those.)

I really hope that I'm wrong, but then again if I'm right then they will
all
be forced to upgrade.   I just need to make sure that I exhaust all
resources before I go and tell someone the bad news about the 95 boxes.


But I think that the script option might be the best approach.

-----Original Message-----
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain


Ok, it was worth a shot.  I have not heard of or seen any tool that will
help you with this.  The only thing I can think of it in your logon
script have it copy a script to the 9x machine, modify the registry to
RunOnce that script you just copied and have that script on next logon
change the domain member ship If that is at all possible.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carerros,
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:13 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain

Upgrading is not an option in this case.  Politically its not allowed
and
technically its not that feasible either (there is an issue with the
number
of Exchange 5.5 environments that are going to be migrated into the new
forest and how this is planned to be done).  

-----Original Message-----
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain


You could potentially upgrade your NT Domain to a child domain of a AD
forest.  This would allow you to keep the netbios name at least for your
network.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carerros,
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain

We are doing a migration from an NT domain into child domain of new AD
forest so we cannot keep the same netbios name.  We also have a slight
problem with our naming convention in that all of our DCs are going to
have
nine character names.  

Thanks, chuck 

-----Original Message-----
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain


If you build your Windows 2003 domain with the same netbios domain name
they Win 9x won't care one way or another.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carerros,
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:39 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain

Hey group,

I'm trying to find an easy way to do a massive migration of Windows
95\98
workstation from an NT domain to a Windows 2003 AD domain, however the
tools
that I'm finding don't seem to function, don't exists, or after
installation
I can't seem to find a domain controller. 

Also, MS seems to have dropped the link to Q article 323466 which is
supposed to have an updated DS client.

If someone has already created some documentation on this process, it
would
be extremely helpful.

Thanks,

Charlie
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to