I don't think I would say that the SAM is more secure than it is with NT.
 
The issue of being hacked is still there and still fairly trivial. The syskey can maybe help depending on the tools used to crack the server and whether it is an attempt to brute force passwords (or Rainbow crack) or gain access to the box. I don't want to get very deep into this but if someone has physical access to the machine, they can own the machine if they so desire - period. Using a user generated password or floppy (and not keeping the floppy with the machine) with SysKey is safer but not tremendously so and again, only for someone trying to steal the password database. Mostly it just adds considerable heartache to management since you have to be in front of the machine (or using some low level IO card to redirect console) to start it. Once the local SAM is cracked, it is one reboot and one more tool away from the DIT being cracked. 
 
Basically if my goal is to steal your passwords in a quiet way, syskey will help a little as it adds another 128 bit encryption piece in front of the hashes. If my goal is to take over your server or domain or forest, syskey doesn't hamper that.
 
  joe


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geary, Simon (Computer People)
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:57 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Syskey and AD

It's still possible, but whether or not it will still be necessary with Windows Server 2003 is another question. The default security of the SAM is higher than with NT. This page gives you the process. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310105

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rosales, Mario
Sent: 15 November 2004 20:03
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Syskey and AD

 

Is it still necessary to syskey DC's?  On NT 4.0 we always did that.  Does the same apply for Windows 2003?



***************************************************************************

The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

***************************************************************************



Reply via email to