Can you give us some insight in to the
problem and what you know so far? Versions of Exchange and AD are also of interest….
~Eric
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Coleman, Hunter
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005
7:44 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT]
Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...
Seems like you're on the right track. With
the message ID and tracking logs, you can back out all of the mailboxes that
got the message. But you already knew that, and probably have let loose a perl
script on the logs. I suppose there may be a way to get a message into a
mailbox without having events logged in the tracking logs, but I can't remember
ever seeing that as long as logging was enabled.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005
7:37 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT]
Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...
Yes. :)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005
8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org;
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT]
Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...
I should have added....are you looking
for thoughts on troubleshooting? Or just asking if anyone has seen this?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Eric Fleischman
Sent: Wed 3/23/2005 5:11 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT]
Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...
I say it
because some of the DLs I'm on, people would find out they
didn't get the message. Such as a required form that they would not fill
out.
Did I call all 4000 people on one of these lists? No I didn't.
Short of having a script that watches every mailbox, I suspect no one on
this list can really answer that question.
~Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 4:48 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL
based but still has an AD portion...
How do you know it works just fine? What proactive checking is done to
verify it? Say 2 people didn't get the message and they didn't realize
there
was a message to not get...
The question is being posed because I am working with some folks who had
a
couple of people (that we know of) out of several thousand that got one
message posted to a DL but didn't get an important followup message. It
is
slowly being reduced to either the expansion is screwed on the Exchange
side
or on the AD side and my bet is Exchange side as I don't expect AD would
not
return all users in a group without throwing at least one error. We know
that it isn't a user issue because there is no evidence in the tracking
logs
of the message ever going to those people. Right now I am trying to get
a
comprehensive list of everyone who did get sent a message so it can be
compared to the DL itself to see if it was just these two people or
more.
joe
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 7:41 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL
based
but still has an AD portion...
I'm on several DLs that are thousands of users in size(some are multiple
times larger than MaxValRange), and it works just fine. (by thousands of
users in size, I'm talking about a single DL that is thousands of users,
not
nested DLs, as that is of course an entirely different test scenario
that
may not hit ranged retrieval)
Why do you ask? Is there a followup technical question? :)
~Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 3:04 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based
but
still has an AD portion...
Has anyone ever actually tested if Exchange properly delivers emails to
all
members of a large (many thousands of mail objects) Distribution List?
Specifically where the Exchange server has to expand a DL and use
attribute
ranging to get all members.
joe
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
