What process, specifically, is running at 100% CPU?

--------
Roger Seielstad
E-mail Geek 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:03 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM
> 
> I have a specific problem related in some way to SP1.
> 
> I have several test environments.  In each I use Virtual Server 2005.
> Each environment is 100% Windows Server 2003.  After 
> upgrading any of the VMs with SP1, the upgraded VM runs at 
> nearly 100% CPU consistently. 
> 
> Removing and reinstalling the VM Additions has no affect.
> 
> Removing SP1 also removes the visible problem.
> 
> You might understand that I have an apprehension towards 
> installing SP1 in production, especially on those systems 
> running as VMs.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Aric Bernard 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric 
> Fleischman
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:27 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM
> 
> Dave can you quantify this statement please? I ask out of 
> curiosity, not disagreement.
> 
> Specifically:
> 1) You referred to SP1 having "too many changes." How did you 
> make this determination? What is the threshold where we cross 
> in to too many?
> 2) What steps will you be going through between now and when 
> you do install it? What will you do between now and 
> deployment to give you the confidence level you need to fire 
> it up on a box and see how it goes?
> 
> Interested, so we can perhaps think through ways to make that 
> less painful going forward.
> ~Eric
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave 
> A. Marquis
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 8:37 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM
> 
> I am certainly going to be waiting to install this one for a 
> while........ to many changes to jump right into it.
> 
> David A. Marquis
> Computer Systems Administrator
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 6:48 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM
> 
> FYI. Windows Server 2003 SP1 went RTM yesterday....
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=22CFC
> 239-337C-4
> D81-
> 8354-72593B1C1F43&displaylang=en
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> This e-mail message, including all attachments, is for the 
> sole use of the intended recipients(s) and may contain 
> confidential and privileged information. You may NOT use, 
> disclose, copy, or disseminate this information. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by 
> reply e-mail immediately. Please destroy all copies of the 
> original message and all attachments.
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to