If you have your site links and costs setup correctly to reflect your underlying network topology and infra, then this should not be a concern, since you have already informed AD where and how it should replicate data.
If 2 sites are replicating and you do not want them to, then either remove the link, or increase the cost, but naturally, you need to ensure that an alternative path exists between these 2 sites. I'm intrigued to know why you think you need to enforce these restrictions. If your underlying network allows data to flow from A to B then why not allow AD to use that underlying transport system? neil -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rubix cube Sent: 10 June 2005 09:59 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Sites to restrict traffic, Hello, How can I use sites to prevent traffic from flowing from one site to another? I have a domain controller for each site, and I want to stop traffic flowing in certain direction (kind of like the trust relationships in windows NT). thanks r.c. List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ ============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml ============================================================================== List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
