Well, yes and no. DNS does load balance via round robin, as Jorge alluded to. 
DCs do not load balance based upon your requirements, where a request is 
forwarded to another DC if the receiver is "busy".

After all, what is the definition of busy??

neil


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TIROA YANN
Sent: 13 June 2005 16:05
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Load balancing LDAP request among my DCs -> Correction 
:)


Ok, thanks for the reply. Your tip might tell me that AD2003 seems to be 
*UNABLE* (and not enable -> sorry for my english :)) , natively, to load 
balance such queries, strange ...... :(

I will chek your link for more informations.

Cheers,

Yann

-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ruston, Neil 
Envoyé : lundi 13 juin 2005 16:20 À : 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org' Objet : 
RE: [ActiveDir] Load balancing LDAP request among my DCs

Have you considered altering SRV record weights/priorities in DNS?

Check out this article 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/Operations/df86810b-9fc5-49b8-a704-d01c042cf460.mspx
 - it may relate to the PDC but applies to DCs in general too.

neil



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TIROA YANN
Sent: 13 June 2005 15:04
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Load balancing LDAP request among my DCs


Hello,
I have a site with 4 DCs 2003.
It seems that one of my DC can not deal with a large number of LDAP queries, GC 
Response and NTLM/Kerberos Auth .... I misunderstand something but is my DC 
2003 is able to check that it cannot deserve these queries and forward 
automatically these queries to another DC that is less busy ? In order wold, 
can AD 2003 natively load-balance queries to another less busy DC ? Regards, 
Yann

==============================================================================
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications 
disclaimer: 

http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml

==============================================================================

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

==============================================================================
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications 
disclaimer: 

http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml

==============================================================================

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to