They are member servers right now with no teaming. About to become DC's. Do you have anything against switch assisted load balancing?
Also, which model catalyst did you have an issue with? Thanks a lot! On 8/17/05, Francis Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've had great success using nic teaming on all my DCs running on hp > Proliant hardware. They were all configured for FT. Make sure the > network side of things fully supports it though, we had to upgrade a few > catalyst switches for this to work correctly (I think it was an ARP > issue) > > I'd suggest trying it on a member server first to make sure your > networking hardware is capable of supporting it correctly. > > One last thing, are those DCs currently in place or you're considering > nic teaming for future deployments? > > Thanks, > Francis > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern > Sent: August 17, 2005 9:24 AM > To: activedirectory > Subject: [ActiveDir] HP teaming > > Any for or against Hp nic teaming on DC's? > Also which type would you use(if any)? Fault tolerence or load > balancing? > > thanks > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
