Maybe you should read about eDIR/NDS... :) Novell did this back in '93.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: 06 October 2005 01:51
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list

I'd be surprised if we see this in my lifetime, or at least before I
retire.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Kaiser
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 2:34 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list

What I want is to be able to run multiple domains on one OS installation
and segment the directories from each other. That way I don't need to
run multiple licenses of the OS, nor do I need hardware that can power 4
VMs.
I already run VMs using VMWare in my test lab; it works but I'd prefer
to be able to run AD as a service and have it be smart enough to be able
to segment itself without needing a separate OS...

**********************
Charlie Kaiser
W2K3 MCSA/MCSE/Security, CCNA
Systems Engineer
Essex Credit / Brickwalk
510 595 5083
**********************
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley 
> [MVP]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:07 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
> 
> You can.  It's called Microsoft Virtual Server.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie 
> Kaiser
> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 6:37 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
> 
> I'd also like to see the ability to run DCs for multiple domains on 
> the same server. SMBs with limited resources balk at having to buy 
> additional server hardware for redundancy on multiple domains, 
> especially when the AD load on the DCs is minimal. This feature sounds

> like an offshoot of your list below.
> If you can run AD as a service, it might not be that hard to allow 
> multiple domains similar to multiple websites/DBs on one server...
> 
> I remember discussing this with Stuart Kwan at DEC a couple of years 
> ago. I hope it makes it into the mix...
> 
> **********************
> Charlie Kaiser
> W2K3 MCSA/MCSE/Security, CCNA
> Systems Engineer
> Essex Credit / Brickwalk
> 510 595 5083
> **********************
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 4:25 PM
> > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
> > 
> > Vista is the client OS. I don't believe they have named Longhorn 
> > Server yet.I am voting for something like Windows Server 5.4.0 or 
> > something like that. I realize that the marketing group would have 
> > something to say about it but I figure the best thing from
> them is if
> > they pronounced their thoughts from the bottom of Lake Washington. 
> > People don't install servers because they have cool names.
> >  
> > The biggest non-NDA pieces that I have heard announced in
> conferences
> > or seen on the web already is the Read Only DC to limit security 
> > exposure for WAN deployments, restartable AD that can be 
> > stopped/started as necessary, DA/Admin separation so that
> you can have
> > an Admin on a DC that "can't" achieve Domain-wide DA level
> rights, and
> > DCs running on Server Foundation or now its called Server
> Core which
> > is a GUI-challenged Windows Server.
> >  
> > I can also say that there are a myriad of GUI updates for the Admin 
> > tools though I can't state specifics. BJ Whalen who was
> involved with
> > the GPMC project has been brought in to work on admin
> experience and
> > anyone who has worked with GPOs with and without GPMC know that he 
> > really helped out.
> >  
> > All in all, there is some very cool stuff and MS has really been 
> > listening to the community on what they want and need. I know that 
> > this list is watched for ideas and such and has been the source of 
> > DCRs internally. So if you have ideas, spout them here,
> they will most
> > certainly be heard. They may not make Longhorn as it is
> getting a bit
> > late to add major changes but your ideas could make it into a later 
> > rev.
> >  
> >  
> >    joe
> >  
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Wood
> > Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:46 PM
> > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> > Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> >  
> > With Windows Vista on it's way what's on people's wish list
> as far as
> > Active Directory is concerned? Also are there any big enhancements 
> > due?
> >  
> > Thanks
> > Steven
> > 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,
accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,
or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling
code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this
email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated
this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,
investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended
for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or
offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments.  NIplc
does not provide investment services to private customers.  Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority.  Registered in England
no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35.  Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,
London, EC1A 4NP.  A member of the Nomura group of companies.

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to