Where is Dean, have not seen him on this list for weeks? -----Original Message----- From: "joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:10:38 To:<ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Yep. Basically the end result is the same, just don't agree with the phrasing much. The best descriptions I have seen have been by Dean Wells. If you search the newsgroups and adorg archives for Dean and Infrastructure Master and Phantoms you will find some pretty in depth discussions. He even describes how to see the update objects using adfind. joe -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:31 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs I don't think Joe is disagreeing with THAT point. John has the general idea, but his description/explanation is somewhat .... shall we say ......glossy. Sincerely, Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCT Microsoft MVP - Directory Services www.readymaids.com - we know IT www.akomolafe.com Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Scott, Anthony Sent: Wed 12/14/2005 8:01 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs John is right though. If all DCs are GCs, putting the IM role on a GC isn't a problem. Thank You, Anthony Scott Berbee 4690 E. Fulton Dr., Bldg. C Ada, Michigan 49301 (616) 481-9722 (616) 464-6369 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za Vue Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 10:45 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs Who wrote it? ************************************************************************ *************************************J John Savill John Savill is Director of Technical Infrastructure for Geniant. He is a CISSP, a Security and Messaging MCSE on Windows Server 2003, a six-time MVP, and a Krav Maga instructor. He is also the author of Windows Server 2003 Active Directory Design and Implementation from Packt Publishing (http://www.packtpub.com/book/active_directory). Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ ***************************************** joe wrote: >Wow who wrote that article in the magazine? That is pretty bad. > >The end result is the same though as stated by everyone so far. If you have >a single domain there is only slight overhead if you make all DCs into GCs. >The only overhead I can really think of is that you will have more global >catalog DNS records and all DCs are listening on an extra 1-2 ports... That >is easily outweighed by the gain of having lots of GC availability. > >Not sure what space usage you would incur by NOT doing it as indicated by >the article. The whole IM role thing is pretty oddly described as well. > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
