to have an empty forest root domain or not... (things I just thought of) POSSIBLES FOR "TO HAVE":
* Large, complex and dynamic organizations * Organization with independent departments and decentralized IT departments (because of this one or more IT departments does not accept the other as being the forest root domain) * Wish to have a forest root domain that is department/region/location independent (incl. its name) (better possibilities to transfer ownership and better resistent to organizational changes) * Stronger security policies for admin accounts POSSIBLES FOR "NOT TO HAVE": * Organization with a centralized IT department * Static organizations * Additional costs and hardware You could have a look at the Windows Server System Reference Architecture --> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/wssra/raguide/default.mspx Directory Services Guide --> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/wssra/raguide/DirectoryServices/igdrbp.mspx?mfr=true (search for section called "Forest Root Design") my 2 cents cheers, jorge Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards, Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto Senior Infrastructure Consultant MVP Windows Server - Directory Services LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven) ( Tel : +31-(0)40-29.57.777 ( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80 * E-mail : <see sender address> ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mark Parris Sent: Wed 2006-04-26 15:36 To: ActiveDir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Root Place Holder justification Does anyone have any official documentation as to the justification for a root place holder, pro's and con's ? Where I am - I have started at one domain and can see no reason to expand on that - they only have 6 DC's now in a single domain - yet the partner they have chosen is recomending a root place holder with 5 DC's and then 8 in the child domain (they are NOT even supplying the tin) and I wanted some decent amo - a little bit stronger than schema and Ent admin separation. I know at DEC the concensus was the desire to eliminate and I believe Guido and Wook have stated this for the past two DEC's I have searched this list and can find no relevant articles. Many thanks Regards Mark List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
<<winmail.dat>>