You don't need to use -f, -af is fine, just slap in the "(!(ourAttribute=TRUE))".
 
The -f overrides most of the query. I recommend it only when/if you find a better query to use than what is in place now.
 
   joe
 
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 4:38 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OldCmp question

I ended up using

oldcmp -report -age 120 -users -f "(&(objectcategory=person)(objectclass=user)(!(ourAttribute=TRUE)))"

And it seemed to work.

 

Thanks



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:50 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OldCmp question

-af "(!(ourProperty=TRUE))"
 
It would be more efficient and faster for the query to actually set all of the non-service accounts to FALSE so then you can do
 
-af "(ourProperty=FALSE)"
 
 
NOT filters aren't the greatest for efficiency plus you can get false positives because an account that you can't see the ourProperty value on due to security will be reported even if it has ourProperty set to TRUE.
 
 
   joe
 
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 3:32 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OldCmp question

I've created a new boolean schema property to flag all of our service accounts in our AD domain.
 
I've gone through and set the boolean to "TRUE" to all the service accounts.
 
Now I want to use oldcmp to go through and find all the ones that aren't "TRUE" and meet other criteria.  I've determined I can do an -af ourProperty=TRUE and show the accounts that are service accounts, but I want any that are NOT service accounts.  I tried -af ourProperty=" " and "" and -af ourProperty="<not set>" and nothing seems to work.  Any ideas?
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail is confidential, may contain proprietary information
of Cameron and its operating Divisions and may be confidential
or privileged.

This e-mail should be read, copied, disseminated and/or used only
by the addressee. If you have received this message in error please
delete it, together with any attachments, from your system.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail is confidential, may contain proprietary information
of Cameron and its operating Divisions and may be confidential
or privileged.

This e-mail should be read, copied, disseminated and/or used only
by the addressee. If you have received this message in error please
delete it, together with any attachments, from your system.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to