When we spoke with the PM out in Redmond
it was said that the feature that allows you to copy a file on one replica and
that file get made up on another with very little replication traffic, e.g. a
comparison taken on the local source and then only the deltas replicated (just
like the rest of the RDC engine but without having done an initial source
of the original file from the upstream partner) required an Enterprise version
of Windows in the mix (somehwere in the DFSR topology). There seems to be
some confusion about this. I'm not talking about RDC, but a feature that
utilises that technology.
For example, you have a VHD (hdd01) and
you copy it to the same folder locally and rename to hdd02. That file
isn't replicated in its entirety. Rather, the hdd01 on the replica is used
to create that file and only the necessary bits that represent the filename
change are replicated.
A couple of people have tried to shoot me
down in flames when I mentioned this, but I know what I heard... :
)
(although I might not be
correct)
--Paul
|
- Re: [ActiveDir] different v... Matt . Duguid
- Re: [ActiveDir] differ... Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
- RE: [ActiveDir] differ... Akomolafe, Deji
- Re: [ActiveDir] differ... Chong Ai Chung
- Re: [ActiveDir] di... Paul Williams
- RE: [ActiveDir] differ... Kannan K T.
- RE: [ActiveDir] differ... Thommes, Michael M.