:)

Fun issue! I never would have hit it. 


--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA
aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 2:29 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Seperating Database and logs on seperate disks

AH HA
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;909265

residual energy drink kicked in

Locate the operating system, the database, and the log files according 
to scenarios 1, 2 or 5. Drive letter assignments on the domain 
controllers do not have to match those in the table.



joe wrote:
> Wow... That is a psychedelic post...  
>
> :)
>
>
> --
> O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
> http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA
> aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:45 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Seperating Database and logs on seperate disks
>
> In the back recesses of my brain I seem to remember a KB that indicated 
> issues when one was there and the other was there and then it got moved 
> over there but not consistent with there that not so good things 
> happened.  (but I just ran out of Mountain Dew Energy drink so I could 
> be delusional right now)
>
>
> joe wrote:
>   
>> I am surprised there aren't more responses to this.
>>
>> My personal opinion is that a vast majority of installations don't need
to
>> separate off the logs for perf. In fact, I have often recommended running
>> everything on a single RAID 0+1/10/5 (partition logically if you want to
>>     
> say
>   
>> separate off the OS and the AD stuff) to get better perf than splitting
>>     
> logs
>   
>> and OS off onto their own disks. Especially in larger orgs for Exchange
>>     
> GCs
>   
>> that tried to follow the deployment docs and do mirror, mirror, mirror or
>> mirror, mirror, 0+1 but didn't have enough disks to get a good 0+1.  
>>
>> In every case that I have had to review DCs with questionable disk
>>     
> subsystem
>   
>> perf, the issues are always around the DIT while the disks for the OS and
>> the Logs are snoozing with IOPS sitting there not being used that could
>>     
> have
>   
>> saved the DIT from getting sucked into the mud. Rebuilding the disk
>> subsystem with all disks in one of the above configurations has
alleviated
>> the issues in every case. Whether RAID 5 or 0+1/10 is faster you will
want
>> to test with your own disk subystems (say with IOMETER), it seems to
vary.
>>     
> I
>   
>> have seen RAID-5 faster and I have seen on different machines 0+1/10
>>     
> faster.
>   
>> A case I am aware of where the logs definitely were good off on their own
>> and would have seriously impacted perf if they weren't was Eric's DIT
>> experiment where he built a 2TB DIT but he was adding objects at a very
>>     
> high
>   
>> rate of speed constantly for quite a while so the logs were being beaten
>> pretty well. 
>>
>>  joe
>>
>>
>> --
>> O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
>> http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
>>  
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AD
>> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 11:29 AM
>> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
>> Subject: [ActiveDir] Seperating Database and logs on seperate disks
>>
>> Is there any other reason other then performance to have the Active
>> Directory log files and database on separate disks?
>>  
>> Opinions are welcome.
>>  
>> Thanks
>>  
>> Yves
>> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
>>
>> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>   
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to