That's a huge question which can be answered in 10,000 words [ over to joe :) ], or with a 'go read up on DFSR, the newer version of DFS' :)
DFS is site aware, uses AD replication topologies, uses compression, replicates deltas only etc etc. As usual, whether one product is more suited than the other - 'it depends'. Try starting here: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/storage/dfs/defa ult.mspx neil -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Condra, Jerry W Mr HP Sent: 06 December 2006 16:34 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] DFS vs Robocopy question Hi all I'm looking for feedback on a couple of scenarios for our environment. We have three W2K3 SP1 domains and WAN separated regions in a couple of them. When deploying software, hotfixes and such I want to go to the 'distribution point' for that domain/region so as not to traverse the WAN for downloads. Each distribution point needs to mirror the others. Each region has an app server where we maintain these distribution points for downloads, patches and such and currently is managed manually as far as keeping each server identical to the other. I'm not familiar with DFS other than what is and does and have not configured or used it. Robocopy seems okay but also has a lot of configuration to deal with. DFS seems to be the best but wanted to see what the experts thought. My concern is if I create the DFS hierarchy I'd still be pointed to one server for the files. In reading the documentation I see multiple roots can be established which I'm hoping would provide access to each regional distribution point and still replicate the latest uploads from one point to all others. Appreciate any feedback. Thanks Jerry PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law, accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of, or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as, investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand, London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies. List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
