If you read my original post at the start of the thread you will see that I have already read this documentation and that we have the reliable:// transport in place (AMQ 3), which if you will read the documentation is the same as failover:// and was renamed for ActiveMQ 4.
Our problems are with the unreliable behaviour experienced when this architecture is in place. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Un-reliable%3A---network-of-AMQ-brokers-with-Lingo-t1744760.html#a4762360 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
