Well I am using JDBC persistence but I am not seeing messages removed from memory ?
gnodet wrote: > > If you don' t use any persistent store, messages must be kept in memory, > so you are obvisouly limited by the available mem. > If you use a jdbc store, messages can be removed from memory and > store for later consumption. > > > On 8/28/06, Anders Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> James.Strachan wrote: >> > >> > We do a similar thing. e.g. we regularly test ActiveMQ by preloading a >> > queue with millions of messages with a small heap of 64Mb and then >> > consuming them all. >> > >> >> What kind of configuration do you use for that? Would topics behave >> differently? >> >> I'm trying to put lots of messages on a topic with a disconnected durable >> subscriber. With ActiveMQ 4.0.1 in the default configuration the producer >> blocks after a few thousand messages. >> Giving it lots and lots of memory lets it receive some more messages, but >> at >> a few tens of thousands of messages it will block again. >> >> Do you have to configure the journal or JDBC persistance somehow to avoid >> this limitation? >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Paging-support-tf2163517.html#a6022232 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Paging-support-tf2163517.html#a6034774 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
