Well James also mentioned that there must be consumers running. If consumers are running millions of messages should work. The case we are talking about is when there are no consumers running and they don't want to miss messages so they register for durable subscrptions.
We really need the feature Fateev was talking about. Anders Bengtsson wrote: > > > Fateev, Maxim wrote: >> >> AFAIK messages are moved from journal to permantent storage (JDBC) on >> every checkpoint. The problem is that references for every message are >> still kept in memory. >> IMHO it is inherent limitation of MessageStore API as it is defined now. >> > > Are you sure? James Strachan said earlier in this thread that ActiveMQ is > tested with "millions of messages with a small heap of 64Mb". Would that > really be possible if it had to keep things in memory? > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Paging-support-tf2163517.html#a6054515 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
