I believe that Tim has made some progress in preparation for a release of
1.0.  Unfortunately, he's away this week on personal business and we won't
be able to cut a release until he's back - so we can coordinate.
Optimistically, it could be sometime next week.

Nate


On 10/23/06, # Lalit Nagpal # <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Nate/ Tim-

Any dates for the release :) ... We are waiting for the release.

Thanks

Lalit Nagpal


tabish121 wrote:
>
>
>> Nate,
>>
>> Yes, that's exactly what I'm after. A release date for activemq-cpp.
> When
>> do
>> you think you'll have a better picture for a release date? What's
> missing
>> to
>> get this?
>
> Martin
>
> The main obstacle is of course time.  I will make the release 1.0 of
> amqcpp my priority upon returning from ApacheCon.  I would imagine it
> should be ready in a couple of weeks.  The remaining issues are really
> quality assurance issues, such as testing builds on more platforms, and
> general testing of the code with unit and integration tests.  Once we
> are satisfied with the state of the code I will package a release
> containing the source as a 1.0 version.
>
> Hang in there, we're almost there.
>
>>
>> Thx!
>> MG
>> --
>> Martin Goulet, B.Sc. * Vice-President, Java Architecture, CSA *
> SunGard
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.sungard.com/csa
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> nmittler wrote:
>> >
>> > Please make the distinction between ActiveMQ and the activemq-cpp
>> client.
>> > ActiveMQ has a long history with several releases:
>> > http://www.activemq.org/site/download.html
>> >
>> > The activemq-cpp client is a separate subproject that is still
> somewhat
>> in
>> > its infancy, but is gaining steam.  We've just had some discussion
> on
>> > creating a first release, but as of right now we don't have any
> dates
>> yet
>> > ... will post when we have a better picture of when this might
> happen.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Nate
>> >
>> > On 10/10/06, Martin Goulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi Tim,
>> >>
>> >> I work with Lalit at SunGard and we are using ActiveMQ as part of
> our
>> >> reference implementation for our company wide software
> architecture.
>> One
>> >> thing that is bugging us quite a bit is the fact that there is no
>> release
>> >> out for activeMQ. When do you think it would be possible to have
> such a
>> >> release?
>> >>
>> >> Thx!
>> >>
>> >> MG
>> >> --
>> >> Martin Goulet, B.Sc. * Vice-President, Java Architecture, CSA *
> SunGard
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.sungard.com/csa
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> tabish121 wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Tim-
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In that case just wanted to know that
>> >> >> a) Is their a official release planned for the broker
>> >> >
>> >> > The Broker has official releases already.  They can be found here
>> >> > http://www.activemq.org/site/download.html
>> >> >
>> >> > The Activemq-cpp does not have an official release currently, we
> have
>> >> > been discussing this and hope to have one soon.  No timeline is
>> >> > currently available however.
>> >> >
>> >> >> b) Which company do you work for and what is the proj about (in
> case
>> u
>> >> > can
>> >> >> tell me ....)
>> >> >
>> >> > I work for Sensis Corp.  http://www.sensis.com/
>> >> >
>> >> > We use AMQ Cpp to provide a high volume message bus for radar
> data
>> >> > processing.  Nate may chime in on this if he feels he can share
>> >> anything
>> >> > that wouldn't violate any company proprietary info as he is
> working
>> on
>> >> > that project.
>> >> >
>> >> >> c) We had a big plan for activemq-cpp .... wanted to create a
>> service
>> >> > bus
>> >> >> ... activemq-cpp could go in as a reference implementation for
> our
>> >> > product
>> >> >> .... we would provide support for 4 diff techs for consumers.
> What
>> >> > kind of
>> >> >> support can we expect Tim.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Those of us working on amq-cpp do so on a volunteer basis; we
> aren't
>> >> > paid to do so.  As such we support it as best we can.  You are
>> welcome
>> >> > to contribute to the project or write issues for bugs that you
> find
>> and
>> >> > we will get to them as fast as we can.
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hey Tim, please reply to me ... I want to promote this in our
> org.
>> >> >
>> >> > I am on travel this week, so responses are delayed a bit, so no
> need
>> to
>> >> > send multiple messages.
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Lalit Nagpal
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> tabish121 wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > # Lalit Nagpal # wrote:
>> >> >> >> Hi
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> If somebody could help me with these questions, I would be
> able
>> to
>> >> >> > convince
>> >> >> >> my managers on using activemq.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Q1. We wanted to know whether their are any plans for an
> official
>> >> >> > release of
>> >> >> >> activemq (with c++).
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > We don't currently do official releases of the activemq-cpp
> code,
>> >> > once
>> >> >> > we do it would still not be included with the broker.
> Activemq-
>> cpp
>> >> > is
>> >> >> > separate from the broker.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Q2. Is activemq-cpp api being used in production anywhere.
> Any
>> >> >> > examples of
>> >> >> >> active usage would definitely help me convince my managers.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > Its currently being used by the company I work for.  We aren't
>> aware
>> >> > yet
>> >> >> > who all is using it besides us, we welcome people to report
> back
>> how
>> >> > its
>> >> >> > working for them.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Q3. Any stats on efficiency would be '+' for me to know about
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > There is some performance data on the ActiveMQ site for the
>> broker.
>> >> > We
>> >> >> > don't currently have any performance data for the cpp client
>> readily
>> >> >> > available.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Please help me with these questions so that I can promote
>> >> > activemq-cpp
>> >> >> >> within my organization
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Lalit Nagpal
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> > http://www.nabble.com/release-for-activemq-
>> >> >> tf2410816.html#a6730280
>> >> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >> http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-release-for-activemq-
>> tf2417364.html#a6742694
>> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-release-for-
>> activemq-tf2417364.html#a6747328
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-release-for-activemq-tf2417364.html#a6951180
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Reply via email to