I should be back next monday, so Nate and I can coordinate then. I was pretty close before I was pulled away, so it shouldn't be long after I get back.
-------------------------------------------------- Timothy A. Bish [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: Nathan Mittler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, October 23, 2006 3:40 pm Subject: Re: release for activemq To: [email protected] > I believe that Tim has made some progress in preparation for a > release of > 1.0. Unfortunately, he's away this week on personal business and > we won't > be able to cut a release until he's back - so we can coordinate. > Optimistically, it could be sometime next week. > > Nate > > > On 10/23/06, # Lalit Nagpal # <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Nate/ Tim- > > > > Any dates for the release :) ... We are waiting for the release. > > > > Thanks > > > > Lalit Nagpal > > > > > > tabish121 wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Nate, > > >> > > >> Yes, that's exactly what I'm after. A release date for > activemq-cpp. > > > When > > >> do > > >> you think you'll have a better picture for a release date? What's > > > missing > > >> to > > >> get this? > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > The main obstacle is of course time. I will make the release > 1.0 of > > > amqcpp my priority upon returning from ApacheCon. I would > imagine it > > > should be ready in a couple of weeks. The remaining issues > are really > > > quality assurance issues, such as testing builds on more > platforms, and > > > general testing of the code with unit and integration tests. > Once we > > > are satisfied with the state of the code I will package a release > > > containing the source as a 1.0 version. > > > > > > Hang in there, we're almost there. > > > > > >> > > >> Thx! > > >> MG > > >> -- > > >> Martin Goulet, B.Sc. * Vice-President, Java Architecture, CSA * > > > SunGard > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.sungard.com/csa > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> nmittler wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Please make the distinction between ActiveMQ and the > activemq-cpp > > >> client. > > >> > ActiveMQ has a long history with several releases: > > >> > http://www.activemq.org/site/download.html > > >> > > > >> > The activemq-cpp client is a separate subproject that is still > > > somewhat > > >> in > > >> > its infancy, but is gaining steam. We've just had some > discussion> > on > > >> > creating a first release, but as of right now we don't have any > > > dates > > >> yet > > >> > ... will post when we have a better picture of when this might > > > happen. > > >> > > > >> > Regards, > > >> > Nate > > >> > > > >> > On 10/10/06, Martin Goulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Hi Tim, > > >> >> > > >> >> I work with Lalit at SunGard and we are using ActiveMQ as > part of > > > our > > >> >> reference implementation for our company wide software > > > architecture. > > >> One > > >> >> thing that is bugging us quite a bit is the fact that > there is no > > >> release > > >> >> out for activeMQ. When do you think it would be possible > to have > > > such a > > >> >> release? > > >> >> > > >> >> Thx! > > >> >> > > >> >> MG > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Martin Goulet, B.Sc. * Vice-President, Java Architecture, > CSA * > > > SunGard > > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.sungard.com/csa > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> tabish121 wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Hi Tim- > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> In that case just wanted to know that > > >> >> >> a) Is their a official release planned for the broker > > >> >> > > > >> >> > The Broker has official releases already. They can be > found here > > >> >> > http://www.activemq.org/site/download.html > > >> >> > > > >> >> > The Activemq-cpp does not have an official release > currently, we > > > have > > >> >> > been discussing this and hope to have one soon. No > timeline is > > >> >> > currently available however. > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> b) Which company do you work for and what is the proj > about (in > > > case > > >> u > > >> >> > can > > >> >> >> tell me ....) > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I work for Sensis Corp. http://www.sensis.com/ > > >> >> > > > >> >> > We use AMQ Cpp to provide a high volume message bus for > radar> > data > > >> >> > processing. Nate may chime in on this if he feels he > can share > > >> >> anything > > >> >> > that wouldn't violate any company proprietary info as he is > > > working > > >> on > > >> >> > that project. > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> c) We had a big plan for activemq-cpp .... wanted to > create a > > >> service > > >> >> > bus > > >> >> >> ... activemq-cpp could go in as a reference > implementation for > > > our > > >> >> > product > > >> >> >> .... we would provide support for 4 diff techs for > consumers.> > What > > >> >> > kind of > > >> >> >> support can we expect Tim. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Those of us working on amq-cpp do so on a volunteer > basis; we > > > aren't > > >> >> > paid to do so. As such we support it as best we can. > You are > > >> welcome > > >> >> > to contribute to the project or write issues for bugs > that you > > > find > > >> and > > >> >> > we will get to them as fast as we can. > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> Hey Tim, please reply to me ... I want to promote this > in our > > > org. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I am on travel this week, so responses are delayed a > bit, so no > > > need > > >> to > > >> >> > send multiple messages. > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Thanks > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Lalit Nagpal > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> tabish121 wrote: > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > # Lalit Nagpal # wrote: > > >> >> >> >> Hi > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> If somebody could help me with these questions, I > would be > > > able > > >> to > > >> >> >> > convince > > >> >> >> >> my managers on using activemq. > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> Q1. We wanted to know whether their are any plans > for an > > > official > > >> >> >> > release of > > >> >> >> >> activemq (with c++). > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > We don't currently do official releases of the > activemq-cpp > > > code, > > >> >> > once > > >> >> >> > we do it would still not be included with the broker. > > > Activemq- > > >> cpp > > >> >> > is > > >> >> >> > separate from the broker. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> Q2. Is activemq-cpp api being used in production > anywhere.> > Any > > >> >> >> > examples of > > >> >> >> >> active usage would definitely help me convince my > managers.> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Its currently being used by the company I work for. > We aren't > > >> aware > > >> >> > yet > > >> >> >> > who all is using it besides us, we welcome people to > report> > back > > >> how > > >> >> > its > > >> >> >> > working for them. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> Q3. Any stats on efficiency would be '+' for me to > know about > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > There is some performance data on the ActiveMQ site > for the > > >> broker. > > >> >> > We > > >> >> >> > don't currently have any performance data for the cpp > client> >> readily > > >> >> >> > available. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> Please help me with these questions so that I can > promote> >> >> > activemq-cpp > > >> >> >> >> within my organization > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> Regards > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> Lalit Nagpal > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> -- > > >> >> >> View this message in context: > > >> >> > http://www.nabble.com/release-for-activemq- > > >> >> >> tf2410816.html#a6730280 > > >> >> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at > > > Nabble.com. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> View this message in context: > > >> >> http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-release-for-activemq- > > >> tf2417364.html#a6742694 > > >> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at > Nabble.com.> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> -- > > >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A- > release-for- > > >> activemq-tf2417364.html#a6747328 > > >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-release-for-activemq- > tf2417364.html#a6951180> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing > list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > >
