I have discussed a proposal to add to Stomp protocol in Stomp - dev forum
and the consus we reached is not change the protocol: Here is link to the
discussion:
http://www.nabble.com/Proposal-1%3A-For-STOMP-protocol-spec-update-tf2508792.html
It is quite simple to extend the existing Stomp destination header field and
AMQ Stomp
server to support a prefix for tempqueue and temptopic as follows:
destination: /tempqueue/a
/temptopic/b
Should I open AMQ bug report or is there a way to request features?
-Sileshi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Implicit-AMQ-Temp-Queue-and-Topic-creation-support-tf2516578.html#a7019134
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
