I have opened improvement AMQ-1008 to address this issue. -Sileshi
sileshi wrote: > > I have discussed a proposal to add to Stomp protocol in Stomp - dev forum > and the consus we reached is not change the protocol: Here is link to the > discussion: > > http://www.nabble.com/Proposal-1%3A-For-STOMP-protocol-spec-update-tf2508792.html > > It is quite simple to extend the existing Stomp destination header field > and AMQ Stomp > server to support a prefix for tempqueue and temptopic as follows: > > destination: /tempqueue/a > /temptopic/b > > > Should I open AMQ bug report or is there a way to request features? > > -Sileshi > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Implicit-AMQ-Temp-Queue-and-Topic-creation-support-tf2516578.html#a7023881 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
