In 4.0.2 the index for messages was held in memory in Kaha - this is
not the case in later releases - please try http://www.activemq.org/
site/activemq-410-release.html
cheers,
Rob
On 29 Dec 2006, at 16:06, Danielius Jurna wrote:
Hi.
Currently I'm evaluating kaha persistance and I have few questions.
1. It seems that flow management for fast producers doesn't work
(it may be
normal due to different persistance nature comparing to journaled
store)
2. It seems that index for messages is held in memory, so broker
can endup
whith OutOfMemoryException on slow consumers.
I was testing kaha which comes whith AMQ 4.0.2. Messages were sent
to queues
without transactions.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Kaha-
persistance-and-memory-usage-tf2895222.html#a8088939
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
