Well, I don't know if it is mod_perl specific, because mod_perl works with ActivePerl built 820 but not with 822.
If you say that there are no many differences between 820 and 822, I can use with no problem the built 820, but I am still curious to know why this happends, because on some machines mod_perl and ActivePerl 822 work. Octavian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Totten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <ActivePerl@listserv.ActiveState.com> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 11:16 PM Subject: Re: Bug in ActivePerl 5.8.8 build 822? > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, David Totten wrote: > >> I have run into similiar behavior. We have a web application that we >> have developed. When running under build 822, it just errors out, but >> works just fine under build 820 and earlier version. >> >> On 10/5/07, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have tried using ActivePerl 5.8.8 build 822 under Windows XP Pro SP2 >>> with >>> Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL. >>> >>> Sometimes when using a mod_perl 2.0.3 application the web server gave an >>> error when trying to start it and if the application was more complex >>> the >>> percent of insuccesses was bigger. >>> >>> If I tried to use a Catalyst application, very rarely the web server >>> could >>> start and work. > > Outside of the differences in core modules, are the same > versions of modules being used with both ActivePerl 820 > and 822? > > Is it possible to reduce the problem to a minimal version? > If so, and if it's mod_perl specific, it's probably best > to do this on the mod_perl mailing list. > > -- > best regards, > Randy _______________________________________________ ActivePerl mailing list ActivePerl@listserv.ActiveState.com To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
