Thanks for the insight. Wondering why AS wiki points to Volker'. On Mar 5, 2012 6:11 AM, "clyfe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I use Sergio's with 3.2, it's less obtrusive and more up to date. > I belive Voker's is at most 3.1 not sure. Also Volker's is more > customized, you need it's specific rails_ujs and possibly other specific > gems (replaces defaults). > I used to use Volker's in the past when it was ahead of Sergio's. > Disclamer: Volker did the huge work of porting to Rails 3. > > Volker is more like: this is my fork, but use it if it suites you and > let's help each other out. > Sergio's is more like: this is the main community project. > > On Saturday, March 3, 2012 4:00:36 AM UTC+2, rvhi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Our app is ready for an upgrade from 2.3.5 to 3.2.1. I haven't been >> following AS very closely recently. It looks like that there are 2 forks, >> Sergio and Volker. What's the status of them? Any comparison? Both seem >> to be very active. Hate to have to choose one. Both seem promising. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/activescaffold/-/Cgn_hxaXmKgJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
