Hi Sergio, Can you verify this too? The README and installation command mentioned vho's version.
https://github.com/activescaffold/active_scaffold_sortable#readme On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Sergio Cambra <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks, I forgot changing it when I copy volker's changes for rails 3 > > On Martes, 6 de marzo de 2012 06:21:31 Richard Zheng escribió: > > https://github.com/activescaffold/active_scaffold > > > > The first sentence of readme is > > > > ** For all documentation see the project website: > > http://github.com/vhochstein/active_scaffold/wiki ** > > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Sergio Cambra > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Where is pointing to Volker? It shouldn't because we have our wiki and > > > Volker's wiki will have some differences. > > > > > > On Lunes, 5 de marzo de 2012 22:58:40 Richard Zheng escribió: > > > > Thanks for the insight. Wondering why AS wiki points to Volker'. > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 2012 6:11 AM, "clyfe" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I use Sergio's with 3.2, it's less obtrusive and more up to date. > > > > > I belive Voker's is at most 3.1 not sure. Also Volker's is more > > > > > customized, you need it's specific rails_ujs and possibly other > > > > > > specific > > > > > > > > gems (replaces defaults). > > > > > I used to use Volker's in the past when it was ahead of Sergio's. > > > > > Disclamer: Volker did the huge work of porting to Rails 3. > > > > > > > > > > Volker is more like: this is my fork, but use it if it suites you > and > > > > > let's help each other out. > > > > > Sergio's is more like: this is the main community project. > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, March 3, 2012 4:00:36 AM UTC+2, rvhi wrote: > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> > > > > >> Our app is ready for an upgrade from 2.3.5 to 3.2.1. I haven't > been > > > > >> following AS very closely recently. It looks like that there are 2 > > > > > > forks, > > > > > > > >> Sergio and Volker. What's the status of them? Any comparison? Both > > > > > > seem > > > > > > > >> to be very active. Hate to have to choose one. Both seem > promising. > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > > Groups > > > > > > > > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > > > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/activescaffold/-/Cgn_hxaXmKgJ. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
