On Viernes, 21 de septiembre de 2012 13:42:23 ruinen escribió: > I ran Google's PageSpeed against my site using ActiveScaffold. It reported > 45 very inefficient rules, 47 inefficient rules, and 6 potentially > inefficient uses of :hover. For example: > > > .active-scaffold-header div.actions div.action_group li a Tag key with 4 > descendant selectors and Class overly qualified with tag and Class overly > qualified with tag I am a novice when it comes to CSS performance, but I > wonder if there are worthwhile improvements to be made? If so, I'd be happy > to investigate fixing this up. Anybody got any thoughts?
Most of the tag.class could be only .class, maybe some selector need the tag.class In this case, probably div could be removed, and li probably too: .active-scaffold-header .actions .action_group a And maybe .actions could be removed too I'm not sure. However, I'm not sure if performance is really bad due to many selectors, I don't know how to measure it. If you want, try to fix it and test you get the same results, and send pull requests, but please, don't make all changes in one commit, I prefer small commits to test it. If you need some help, ask me -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/activescaffold/-/ifwmfGZTpgYJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
