Support.
The marginal public awareness utility of the IPv6 requirement is not worth
the policy verbiage.
Well-intentioned but inappropriate use of policy to burden members with
unwanted IPv6 space.
It's like I want a piece of cake and mother says okay, but you must also
take some more vegetables.
The vegetables remain on the plate, uneaten and destined for the garbage,
because mother thinks I might try them and like them.
I would change my mother's policy if I could!
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Bais
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and
ImpactAnalysis Published (Removing IPv6 Requirement for ReceivingSpace from
the Final /8)
Support +1
