Dear Address Policy WG, On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 02:50:37PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > The review phase for 2014-04 has ended. > > Given the amount of support over the lifetime of this proposal, and the > nature of the opposition, I have decided that we have reached rough > consensus (Sander as co-chair has abstained, because he has officially > taken an opionion). > > The main counterargument brought up was that this would lower the incentive > for LIRs to adopt IPv6 and would create the impression that IPv6 is no > longer important to the RIPE community. To counter that, the chairs will > ask the RIPE NCC to continue their good work in raising IPv6 awareness > and to continue to mention it on IPv4 /22 requests. > > So, I consider the counterarguments addressed, and see enough support to > declare rough consensus and move the proposal forward.
The "last call" phase has now ended. Unlike most proposals, there was quite a bit of discussion in Last Call. After reviewing the messages sent, the chairs have decided that no new arguments have been brought up - and repetition of arguments that have been discussed and addressed before does not stop consensus, if strong support exists otherwise. It might be a bit more rough than for other proposals, but "rough consensus" is good enough. Thus, the chairs hereby declare consensus on 2014-04. If you disagree with this decision please contact the working group chairs (preferably on this public mailing list and otherwise by sending mail to [email protected]). Should that not resolve the problem then you can appeal to the WG chairs collective (as per section 4 of ripe-614). Marco will send the formal announcement from the NCC soon. regards, Gert Doering and Sander Steffann -- APWG chairs -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgpV_LPB9qYVd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
