I can't remain indifferent to such interesting proposal :) So I have to continue (no matter has it formal impact or not).
25.04.2015, 16:28, "Gert Doering" <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:22:15PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote: >> I think you mix "preventing making profit" and "assure available IPv4 space >> to new entrants". >> >> As I calculated (and presented my results some days ago) reselling has low >> impact on IPv4 exhaustion. >> >> So the only reason (as I see it) is just to prevent earning money. >> >> Therefore I have reasonable question: why do some members worry about >> someone's profit? > > Because it's a common good, and not there to further individual members' > profit. Or, as your mother might have said every now and then, "just > imagine what happens if everyone did this". > > But you can stop this discussion now. > > First, because it happens outside the formal process anyway, so whatever is > said is not relevant for the proposal anyway. > > Second, because you've made your point fairly clear. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
