Hi, On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:11:56PM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote: > As we see some people decided to ignore others who want to tell their > opposition opinion and welcome those, who agree. I thought the RIPE NCC is > community, expressing all people position. But I was wrong.
In general, we don't ignore voices opposing a proposal.
In this particular case, when we aim to make particular behaviour more
uninteresting, it is expected that people that make a profit from this
particular behaviour will not like the change - we do hear the arguments,
but "I want to keep doing what the rest of the community considers
abusive, because I make a profit from it!" is not a very strong argument
here.
If everyone else would just shrug their shoulders and say "well, we don't
care", such opposition would be sufficient - but if there are strong voices
in favour of going ahead, the WG chairs needs to make a judgement - and we
will, at the end of the review phase, and explain to the group why we
decided.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgpm70flMcTG5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
