On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote:
The proposal aims to expand the criteria for evaluating initial
IPv6 allocations larger than a /29. The RIPE NCC would consider
additional aspects beyond only the number of existing users and
extent of the organisation's infrastructure.
1) I've some issues with the language of the proposal, namely the
idea of "mitigating wastefulness" by prescribing or proscribing
certain concepts and practices either by the NCC or the
community. I believe that everyone runs their own network at the
end of the day and neither the NCC, the membership nor the
apwg community are qualified to judge individual members' network
design decisions.
2) There is some issue with transparency if the text is removed
as proposed insofar as there is, then, no guidance whatsoever on
how an alloc request >/29 is judged. Perhaps this can be
addressed in the NCC Impact Statement.
3) I'm inclined to support this proposal, however, if these
issues are addressed.
rgds,
Sascha Luck
rgds,
Sascha Luck
