Hi all I support this proposal +1
From my background as Chair of the Swiss IPv6 Council and many years of working with large organizations such as enterprises and governments, I know that basing an allocation size on number of users and size of network is not sufficient and does not allow them to create address plans that meet their various requirements. I think the RIPE NCC needs an open framework to be able to make meaningful allocations to such organizations, and thereby support and maybe even accelerate the deployment of IPv6 in the RIPE region. I therefore support it. Silvia Chair Swiss IPv6 Council -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von LIR (BIT I 5) Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2015 11:57 An: Address Policy Working Group Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size) Hello, I agree with this opinion. Therefore: +1 Carsten LIR de.government -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von James Blessing Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. April 2015 14:20 An: Address Policy Working Group Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size) On 28 April 2015 at 13:00, Marco Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The proposal aims to expand the criteria for evaluating initial IPv6 > allocations larger than a /29. The RIPE NCC would consider additional aspects > beyond only the number of existing users and extent of the organisation's > infrastructure. > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-03 Support at current stage - may change after seeing IA J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
