Hi André, > On 09.07.2015 14:19, Marco Schmidt wrote: >> We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments >> to [email protected] before 7 August 2015. > > tl;dr: I support the proposal in the current state. > > I do not really think this will help the routing table growth as > outlined in section B of the impact analysis though. The organisations > that are likely to request address space under the proposed rules will > probably announce the received address space with some sort of > de-aggregation. > > But I do think this proposal can remove constraints some organisation > currently have when deploying (or trying to deploy) IPv6.
I have already been thinking about the de-aggregation, and especially for national networks I think there are ways to keep that under control. But that's not really address policy related. I'll take it to our Routing WG. Cheers, Sander
